A Good Critique Partner
The subject of Critique Partners seems to be overflowing the blogosphere lately, and I have to say that it's been on my mind as well. What really makes a good critique partner? Is it someone who will rip you to shreds? Is it someone who is an expert in the compliment sandwich (compliment, critique, compliment)? Or is it something more?
This answer probably differs from person to person, but here is what qualifies as a good critique partner in my mind --
I know, simple, right? But really, I think this needs an explanation becasue I don't think it's clear to everyone. A critique partner who does nothing but rip on your work is not helpful, nor is someone who does nothing but tell you how much they like something. To be a truly helpful critique partner in my mind, there needs to be a balance of both.
Let's start with an example --
CP1: This sentence is really weak, and I hate everything else about this chapter.
CP2: There is something off about this sentence but I don't know what. By the way, this is the best book ever!
Now you tell me, which partner do you want? I want #3. They are being honest with me without being rude, and they are giving suggestions so that I have an approach on how to fix it.
Which brings me to another point, I want a critique partner who is willing to brain storm with me rather than tell me something is wrong. I know there are things wrong with the book, that is why I am asking for you to help review it. You can't just point out a mistake without giving me suggestions for improvement. Otherwise, I'm stuck.
What else would you add? What makes the best critique partners?
This answer probably differs from person to person, but here is what qualifies as a good critique partner in my mind --
Someone Who Will Help You
I know, simple, right? But really, I think this needs an explanation becasue I don't think it's clear to everyone. A critique partner who does nothing but rip on your work is not helpful, nor is someone who does nothing but tell you how much they like something. To be a truly helpful critique partner in my mind, there needs to be a balance of both.
![]() |
| source |
Let's start with an example --
CP1: This sentence is really weak, and I hate everything else about this chapter.
CP2: There is something off about this sentence but I don't know what. By the way, this is the best book ever!
CP3: I had to read this sentence a few times to fully understand it. Perhaps if you changed the wording to something more like (insert sample sentence) then I would understand it better.
Now you tell me, which partner do you want? I want #3. They are being honest with me without being rude, and they are giving suggestions so that I have an approach on how to fix it.
Which brings me to another point, I want a critique partner who is willing to brain storm with me rather than tell me something is wrong. I know there are things wrong with the book, that is why I am asking for you to help review it. You can't just point out a mistake without giving me suggestions for improvement. Otherwise, I'm stuck.
What else would you add? What makes the best critique partners?
***
On a completely separate note, feel free to go vote for the beginning of my book in the Project Writeway contest here. Really, go ahead and go. Now.

Comments
Plus, they are the most supportive people ever!
Great post, J.A.! :)
For example, my book has been through many betas and my critique group. When I was visiting with my daughter and her family, my son-in-law finally mentioned that one scene wasn't believable for him. No one else had been troubled by it, but it was an easy enough thing for me to tweak so that the story continued as it needed to but did cause him grief. That's why I like input from a variety of sources.
Five members of my online critique group read my ms. I took their suggested edits/comments and merged them all into one document. It was very telling when I could read for several pages without a comment and suddenly four or five of them all commented on a paragraph. It really didn't matter what they said. I knew there was a problem there.
I have had a few 1's. In fact, I still have two of those. However, I'm trying to distance myself from the negative non-constructive crit partners. I like my critiques with a side of constructive ;)
And I won't linger cause I'm off to vote... NOW! :) Good luck!
It's such a fine line to walk....you want to help your CPs, but you certainly don't want to discourage them! I agree #3 is the best.
I really dislike the sandwich technique; it strikes me as insincere!
Excellent post :)
Great post!